Factors influencing career well-being of medical laboratory professionals
A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56226/118Keywords:
Healthcare workers, Quality of work life, Job satisfaction, clinical laboratory professionalsAbstract
Background: Career well-being across the healthcare system worldwide is correlated with a massive occupational burden due to several emerging factors. Medical laboratory professionals (MLPs) play a key role in diagnosis, treatment planning and infection control. MLPs have undergone significant emotional and financial decline over the past decades, which has diminished job satisfaction, productivity, mental health, and retention. Despite the expectation that career satisfaction is primarily influenced by financial and emotional aspects, the existing literature on job satisfaction among medical laboratory professionals (MLPs) remains scarce.
Objectives: The aim of this paper is to expand knowledge through available literature on the factors influencing the career well-being of medical laboratory professionals.
Methods: Research articles published between 2018 and 2025 on PubMed, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Web of Science, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases were accessed. A critical review of original experimental and observational studies addressing the career satisfaction of medical laboratory professionals was conducted to develop a narrative review. Studies that did not present relevant data and those that did not contain primary data were excluded.
Results: A total of 150 articles were retrieved and 19 articles were selected to study a variety of factors that contribute to MLPs’ well-being, including occupational satisfaction, motivation, financial stability, job security, a favorable policy framework, benefits, career development and recognition. The main factors identified include workplace environment, workload, mental health, pay and benefits, leave policy, job security, work-life balance, professional growth and development, administrative capacity, employee retention, and turnover. This review illustrates that several factors affect the career well-being of medical laboratory staff to differing extents. The findings indicate that inadequate pay, heavy workload and limited professional development opportunities are strongly linked to low job satisfaction and increase emotional stress among laboratory professionals. These findings also highlight the importance of tailored Continuous Professional Development (CPD) programs and strong leadership to improve efficiency and staff retention.
Conclusion: In terms of the real-world situation, this narrative review highlights the key elements influencing medical laboratory professionals' occupational well-being. This article aims to enhance awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the most recent research findings on this topic. These findings will contribute to evidence-based practice and to the development of strategies to improve human resource management.
Main Contribution to Evidence-Based Practice: This article helps to raise awareness among healthcare professionals about the current level of job satisfaction among medical laboratory professionals. The findings of this research will contribute valuable knowledge to the global health sector by highlighting job dissatisfaction among medical laboratory professionals and supporting evidence-based practice.
References
Alrawahi, S., Sellgren, S. F., Alwahaibi, N., Altouby, S., & Brommels, M. (2018). Factors affecting job satisfaction among medical laboratory technologists in University Hospital, Oman: An exploratory study. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 34(1), e763–e775. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2689
Alrawahi, S., Stina Fransson Sellgren, Salem Altouby, Nasar Alwahaibi, & Mats Brommels. (2024). Stress and job satisfaction among medical laboratory professionals in Oman: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon, 10(3), e25456–e25456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25456
Ayalew, A. F., Ma, W., Tamir, W., & Kefale Mitiku. (2024). Quality of work life and associated factors among health professionals working at private and government health institutions in Awi zone, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia, 2022: a comparative cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377145
Haider, T., Efa, S. S., Hossain, Md. E., Ara Shampa, S. G., Mahdee, S. N., Reza, R., & Al Fidah, Md. F. (2023). Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction among Healthcare Providers in a Specialty Department: a cross-sectional study. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.24.23291811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.24.23291811
Healthcare, in. (2023). Needle.Tube - Diagnostic Lab Supplies, Great Prices, Fast Delivery, Blood Collection Needles, Blood Collection Tubes, Infusion Needles. Needle.Tube - Diagnostic Lab Supplies, Great Prices, Fast Delivery, Blood Collection Needles, Blood Collection Tubes, Infusion Needles. https://www.needle.tube/resources-9/the-critical-role-of-medical-laboratory-professionals-in-healthcare
Kenwright, K. (2018). Career Satisfaction in the Profession of Medical Laboratory Science. Journal of Allied Health, 47(3), 222–227. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327990354_Career_Satisfaction_in_the_Profession_of_Medical_Laboratory_Science
Lo, J., Fayyaz, Y., Jaswal, S., Gohar, B., Yazdani, A., Chattu, V. K., & Nowrouzi-Kia, B. (2023). Factors Associated with Job Satisfaction in Medical Laboratory Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study in Ontario, Canada. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13010004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13010004
Michigan Tech. (2025). What is Medical Laboratory Science? | Biological Sciences | Michigan Tech. Michigan Technological University. https://www.mtu.edu/biological/undergraduate/medical/what/
Moldabekov, Y., Nurgaliyeva, Y., Smagulova, A., Smagulov, A., & Saiymova, M. (2025). Comparison of job satisfaction between government employees and private sector employees. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(1), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.3822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.3822
Nowrouzi-Kia, B., Dong, J., Gohar, B., & Hoad, M. (2022). Examining the Mental Health, Wellbeing, Work Participation and Engagement of Medical Laboratory Professionals in Ontario, Canada: An Exploratory Study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.876883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.876883
Schmidt, D., & Latzke, M. (2023). Medical laboratory technicians’ job satisfaction in Generations X, Y, and Z: Findings from an online survey in Austria / Arbeitszufriedenheit österreichischer biomedizinischer Analytiker*innen in den Generationen X, Y und Z: Ergebnisse einer Online-Umfrage aus Österreich. International Journal of Health Professions, 10(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2023-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2023-0015
Simmons, D. (2019). What is a medical laboratory scientist? University of Cincinnati. https://online.uc.edu/blog/what-is-medical-laboratory-scientist/
University of Massachusetts Global. (2025). A closer look at the professional development opportunities employees really want. UMass Global. https://www.umassglobal.edu/blog-news/a-closer-look-at-the-professional-development-opportunities-employees-really-want
Waheed, U., Ahmed, K., & Iqbal, T. (2024). Curriculum Diversity in BS Medical Laboratory Technology: A Comparative Analysis of National and International Universities.
World Health Organization. (2011). Laboratory quality management system: handbook. Www.who.int. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548274
World Health Organization. (2022, November 7). Occupational health: health workers. Www.who.int. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/occupational-health--health-workers
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Publisher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Start-up >